Robert Schütze

European
Union Law

Fourth Edition

Part III

Substantive Law

18. EU Internal Policies: An Overview
  • 12. Limiting Powers: EU Fundamental Rights
  • 1. Constitutional History: From Paris To Lisbon
  • 13. Free Movement: Goods I—Negative Integration
  • 2. Constitutional Nature: A Federation Of States
  • 14. Free Movement: Goods II—Positive Integration
  • 15. Free Movement: Persons—Workers and Beyond
  • 16. Free Movement: Services and Capital
  • 3. Governmental Structure: Union Institutions I
  • 17. EU Competition Law: Private Undertakings
  • 18. EU Internal Policies: An Overview
  • 4. Governmental Structure: Union Institutions II
  • 19. EU External Policies: An Overview
  • 20. Epilogue: Brexit and the Union: Past, Present, Future
  • 5. European Law I: Nature—Direct Effect
  • 21. Appendix: How to Study European Law
  • 7. Legislative Powers: Competence and Procedures
  • 8. External Powers: Competence and Procedures
  • 6. European Law II: Nature—Primacy/Pre-emption
  • 9. Executive Powers: Competence and Procedures
  • 10. Judicial Powers I: (Centralized) European Procedures
  • 11. Judicial Powers II: (Decentralized) National Procedures
  • 22. Extra chapter: Competition Law II: State Interferences

Introduction

The European Union began its life as a purely economic union. When born in 958, its principle task was to ‘establish … a common market and progressively approximate … the economic policies of Member States’. The creation of the common market thereby included, in particular, the establishment of ‘a system ensuring that competition in the common market is not distorted’. Yet outside the few additional economic areas covered by the 1958 Rome Treaty, the Union seemed powerless.

This picture began to change in 1972, when the Member States decided to expand the spectrum of positive Union policies. This expansion was originally based on the Union’s general competences: Articles 115 and 352; and on the bases of both provisions, several ‘flanking policies’ gradually developed. (These policies were so called because they were said to only ‘flank’ the establishment of the internal market.) Starting with the Single European Act, the Union was indeed given ever more specific competences in ever-wider fields. These express competences can today be found in Part III of the TFEU entitled ‘Internal Policies and Internal Actions’ (see Table 18.1).

No textbook can – of course – provide a meaningful overview of all 24 internal Union policies. Yet what a textbook should do is to offer a compass through the substantive law of the Union. For not only are most cases discussed in this book – even the most ‘constitutional’ ones – embedded in a substantive policy area, the great majority of Union legislation deals with a specific ‘policy’, and that policy provides the substance with which European citizens – buyers, employees and consumers – primarily come into contact.

Five of the 24 internal Union policies have already been discussed in the previous chapters: the four fundamental freedoms (Titles I–IV) were discussed in Chapters 13–16, while European competition policy (Title VII) was discussed in Chapter 17. This chapter wishes to add a – brief – overview of four policy areas that have come to also significantly affect the lives of European citizens. Section 1 provides an introduction to the Union’s Economic and Monetary Policy. This policy is not only responsible for the creation of a common European currency – the euro – which has become a leading world currency; it recently provoked enormous controversy over the powers of the European Union to interfere with national economic choices. Section 2 moves to ‘Social Policy’. This is an important internal policy for a continent that prides itself as being the ‘social continent’. Section 3 then explores the Treaty Title on ‘Consumer Protection’, which has had an enormous impact on national contract laws. Section 4 looks – finally – at the Union’s regional or cohesion policy. With €325 billion at its disposal, this policy represents one-third of the Union budget and is tremendously important in creating a Europe that recognises its ‘regions’ as a third level of government below the Member States.

Cases

Case C-320/00 Lawrence
Case C-320/00 Commission of the European Communities v Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH and C. H. Boehringer Sohn (2002) ECR I-01917; Internal policies, veterinary medicinal products, fixing maximum residue limits.
Case C-392/92 Schmidt
Case C-392/92 Christel Schmidt v Spar- und Leihkasse der früheren Ämter Bordesholm, Kiel und Cronshagen (1994) ECR I-01311; Internal policies, safeguarding of employees' rights in the event of the transfer of an undertaking.
Case C-84/94 UK v Council
Case C-84/94 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Council of the European Union (1996) ECR I-05755; Internal policies, organization of working time, action for annulment, Directive.
Case C-13/95 Süzen
Case C-13/95 Ayse Süzen v Zehnacker Gebäudereinigung GmbH Krankenhausservice (1997) ECR I-01259; Internal policies, safeguarding of employees' rights in the event of transfers of undertakings.
Case 170/84 Bilka-Kaufhaus
Case 170/84 Bilka-Kaufhaus GmbH v Weber von Hartz (1986); Internal policies, objective justification, indirect discrimination, worker.

Legislation

EU Regulations

Council Regulation (EC) No. 1466/97 of 7 July 1997 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies

Regulation (EC) No. 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No. 295/91, [2004] OJ L 46/1

Regulation (EC) No. 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on a European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC), [2006] OJ L 210/19

Council Regulation (EU) No. 407/2010 of 11 May 2010 establishing a European financial stabilisation mechanism, [2010] OJ L 118/1

Regulation (EU) No. 1092/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on European Union macro-prudential oversight of the financial system and establishing a European Systemic Risk Board, [2010] OJ L 331/1

Regulation (EU) No. 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), amending Decision No. 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/78/EC, [2010] OJ L 331/12

Regulation (EU) No. 1094/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority), amending Decision No 716/ 2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/79/EC, [2010] OJ L331/48

Regulation (EU) No. 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), amending Decision No. 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/77/EC, [2010] OJ L 331/84

Council Regulation (EU) No. 1096/2010 of 17 November 2010 conferring specific tasks upon the European Central Bank concerning the functioning of the European Systemic Risk Board, [2010] OJ L 331/162

Regulation (EU) No. 1173/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2011 on the effective enforcement of budgetary surveillance in the euro area, [2011] OJ L 306/1

Regulation (EU) No. 1174/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2011 on establishing enforcement measures to correct excessive macroeconomic imbalances in the euro area, [2011] OJ L 306/8

Regulation (EU) No. 1175/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2011 amending Council Regulation (EC) No. 1466/97 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies, [2011] OJ L 306/12

Regulation (EU) No. 1176/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2011 on the prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbal- ances, [2011] OJ L 306/25

Council Regulation (EU) No. 1177/2011 of 8 November 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No. 1467/97 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure, [2011] OJ L 306/33

Regulation (EU) No. 472/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on the strengthening of economic and budgetary surveillance of Member States in the euro area experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability, [2013] OJ L 140/1

Regulation (EU) No. 473/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on common provisions for monitoring and assessing draft budgetary plans and ensuring the correction of excessive deficit of the Member States in the euro area

Council Regulation (EU) No. 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions, [2013] L 287/63

Regulation (EU) No. 1299/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on specific provisions for the support from the European Regional Development Fund to the European territorial cooperation goal, [2013] OJ L 347/259 (ERDF Regulation II)

Regulation (EU) No. 1300/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the Cohesion Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No. 1084/2006, [2013] OJ L 347/281 (Cohesion Fund Regulation)

Regulation (EU) No. 1301/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the European Regional Development Fund and on specific provisions concerning the investment for growth and jobs goal and repealing Regulation (EC) No. 1080/2006, [2013] OJ L 347/289 (ERDF Regulation I)

Regulation (EU) No. 1302/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No. 1082/2006 on a European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC) as regards the clarification, simplifica- tion and improvement of the establishment and functioning of such groupings, [2013] OJ L 347/303

Regulation (EU) No. 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No. 1083/2006, [2013] OJ L 347/320 (Common Provisions Regulation)

Regulation (EU) No. 1304/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the European Social Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No. 1081/2006, [2013] OJ L 347/470

Regulation (EU) No. 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No. 1698/2005, [2013] OJ L 347/487

Council Regulation (EU, EURATOM) No. 1311/2013 of 2 December 2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014–2020, [2013] OJ L 347/884

Regulation (EU) No. 468/2014 of the European Central Bank of 16 April 2014 establishing the framework for cooperation within the Single Supervisory Mechanism between the European Central Bank and national competent autho- rities and with national designated authorities, [2014] OJ L 141/1 (SSM Framework Regulation)

EU Directives

Council Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products, [1985] OJ L 210/29 (Product Liability Directive)

Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work, [1989] OJ L 183/1

Council Directive 92/85/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding (tenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC), [1992] OJ L 348/1

Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer con- tracts, [1993] OJ L 95/29 (Unfair Contract Terms Directive)

Council Directive 97/81/EC of 15 December 1997 concerning the Framework Agreement on part-time working concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC, [1998] OJ L 14/9

Directive 98/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 on consumer protection in the indication of the prices of products offered to consumers, [1998] OJ L 80/31

Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees, [1999] OJ L 171/12

Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agree- ment on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, [1999] OJ L 175/43

Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses, [2001] OJ L 82/16 (Transfer of Undertakings Directive)

Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, [2003] OJ L 299/9 (Working Time Directive)

Directive 2005/29 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market, [2005] OJ L 149/22 (Unfair Commercial Practices Directive)

Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast), [2006] OJ L 204/23 (Equal Treatment Directive)

Directive 2008/94/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 on the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer, [2008] OJ L 283/36 (Insolvency Protection Directive)

Council Directive 2010/18/EU of 8 March 2010 implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC and repealing Directive 96/34/EC

Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, [2011] OJ L 304/64 (Consumer Rights Directive)

Council Directive 2011/85/EU of 8 November 2011 on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States, [2011] OJ L 306/41

EU Decisions

International Agreements

Figures

Further Reading

Books

Articles

K. Alexander, ‘European Banking Union; A Legal and Institutional Analysis of the Single Supervisory Mechanism and the Single Resolution Mechanism’ (2015) 40 EL Rev. 154

M. Herdegen, ‘Price Stability and Budgetary Restraints in the Economic and Monetary Union: The Law as Guardian of Economic Wisdom’ (1998) 35 CML Rev 9

N. Kontouris, ‘EU law and the Regulation of “Atypical Work”‘ in A. Bogg et al. (eds), Research Handbook on EU Labour Law (Elgar, 2016), 426

R. M. Lastra and J.-V. Louis, ‘European Economic and Monetary Union: History, Trends, and Prospects?’ (2013) 32 YEL 57

M. Markakis, ‘The New EU Economic Governance Framework: Principle, Policy, and Enforcement’ (2024) 49 EL Rev. 478

H. Micklitz and N. Reich, ‘The Court and Sleeping Beauty: The Revival of the Unfair Contract Terms Directive (UCTD)’ (2014) 51 CML Rev 771

A. Oliveira, M. de la Corte-Rodríguez and F. Lütz, ‘!e New Directive on Work-Life Balance: Towards a New Paradigm of Family Care and Equality’ (2020) 45 EL Rev. 295

S. Sciarra, ‘Collective Agreements in the Hierarchy of European Community Sources’ in P. Davies et al. (eds.), European Community Labour Law: Principles and Perspectives (Oxford University Press, 1996), 189

J. Scott, ‘Regional Policy: An Evolutionary Perspective’ in P. Craig and G. de Búrca (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford University Press, 2011), 625

J. Struyck, ‘The Court of Justice and the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’ (2015) 52 CML Rev. 721

S. Weatherill, ‘The Consumer Rights Directive: How and Why a Quest for “Coherence” Has (Largely) Failed’ (2012) 49 CML Rev 1279

O. Žáček, ‘How to Get In? Euro Area Entry Criteria in Books and in Action’ (2021) 59 CML Rev. 1141

How to Find (and Read) the EU Treaties

The EU Treaties constitute the primary law of the Union. The formula the ‘EU Treaties’ or simply ‘the Treaties’ commonly refers to two Treaties: the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

The ‘Treaties’ are the result of a long ‘chain novel’ of consecutive treaties (see Table 20.1). They started out from three ‘Founding Treaties’ that created the European Coal and Steel Community (1951), the European Atomic Energy Community (1957) and the European (Economic) Community (1957). A myriad of subsequent ‘Amendment Treaties’ and ‘Accession Treaties’ gradually changed the textual basis of the three Communities significantly; and this first treaty base would be complemented by a second treaty base in 1992, when the Maastricht Treaty created the (old) European Union.

To simplify the – very complex – textual foundations of the old European Union and European Communities Treaties, the Member States tried to create a single treaty in the early 2000s. The 2004 Constitutional Treaty was indeed intended to repeal all previous treaties; and it was to merge the European Union with the European Communities. Yet the attempt to ‘recreate’ one Union, with one legal personality, on the basis of one treaty failed; and the Member States thereafter resorted to yet another ‘Amendment Treaty’: the 2007 Reform Treaty – also called the Lisbon Treaty.

Despite its modest name, the Lisbon Treaty constitutes a radical new ‘chapter’ in the Union’s constitutional chain novel. For while it formally builds on the original ‘Founding Treaties’, it has nonetheless ‘merged’ the old ‘Community’ legal order with the old ‘Union’ legal order into a new ‘Union’ legal order.

Nevertheless, unlike the 2004 Constitutional Treaty, the 2007 Lisbon Treaty has not created a single treaty base for the European Union. Instead, it recognises the existence of two (main) treaties: the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The division into two EU Treaties thereby follows a functional criterion: the Treaty on European Union (TEU) contains the general provisions defining the Union, while the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) contains the specific provisions with regard to the Union institutions and policies. One of the new features of the post-Lisbon era is the possibility of minor treaty amendments instigated by European Council Decisions.

In addition to ‘Amendment Treaties’ there are now also ‘Amendment Decisions’ adopted by the European Council (see Table 21.4). The EU Treaties can today be found on the European Union’s

EUR-Lex website: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/collection/eu-law/treaties.html, but there are also a number of solid paper copies such as Blackstone’s EU Treaties & Legislation or my own EU Treaties and Legislation collection. What is the structure of today’s EU Treaties? The structure of the TEU and TFEU is shown in Table 20.4. The (longer) TFEU is divided into ‘Parts’ – ‘Titles’ – ‘Chapters’ – ‘Sections’ –‘Articles’, while the (shorter) TEU only starts with a division into ‘Titles’. The EU Treaties are joined by numerous Protocols and the ‘Charter of Fundamental Rights’. According to Article 51 TEU, Protocols to the Treaties ‘shall form an integral part thereof’; and the best way to make sense of them is to see them as legally binding ‘footnotes’ to a particular article or section of the Treaties.

By contrast, the Charter is ‘external’ to the Treaties; yet it also has ‘the same legal value as the Treaties’.

How to Find (and Read) EU Secondary Law

The Union publishes all of its acts in the Official Journal of the European Union. Paper versions can be found in every library that houses a ‘European Documentation Centre’, but electronic versions are also openly available on the Union’s EUR-Lex website: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/direct-access.html. The Union distinguishes between two Official Journal series: the L-series and the C-series. The former contains all legally binding acts adopted by the Union (including its international agreements), while the latter publishes all other information and notices. Originally, only the paper version of the Official Journal was ‘authentic’; but since 1 July 2013, electronic versions of the Official Journal (e-OJ) are equally authentic and therefore endowed with formal legal force.

Union secondary law will first mention the instrument in which it is adopted. It will typically have the form of a ‘Regulation’, a ‘Directive’ or a ‘Decision’. This will be followed by two figures. In the past, where the Union act was a regulation, the figure was: number/year; while for directives and decisions this was inversed: year/number. However, since 2015, this has changed and all main Union instruments are now arranged by year/number.treaty base would be complemented by a second treaty base in 1992, when the Maastricht Treaty created the (old) European Union.

Where the year and number are known for a given EU act, the easiest way to find it is to use the Union’s EU-lex search engine: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html. Importantly, there may be two or more acts for a given number combination, especially where a ‘legislative’ act has been followed by a non-legislative act. For two types of non-legislative acts – namely: ‘delegated’ and ‘implementing’ acts – the EU Treaties require that they contain the word ‘delegated’ or ‘implementing’ in their title. This is to indicate – at first glance – that these executive acts have been adopted according to a particular decision-making procedure. States thereafter resorted to yet another ‘Amendment Treaty’: the 2007 Reform Treaty – also called the Lisbon Treaty.

What is the structure of a piece of Union legislation? After its ‘Title’ there follows a brief summary of the decision-making procedure that led to the adoption of the act – including a reference to the legal competence on which it was based. Thereafter comes the ‘Preamble’, which sets out the reasons for which the Union act has been adopted. The content of the act is subsequently set out in various ‘articles’, which may be grouped into ‘Sections’ and ‘Chapters’. For very technical Union legislation, there may also be an Annex – which, like a ‘Schedule’ in a UK statute, adds detailed provisions ‘outside’ the core content of the act. To illustrate this legislative structure, let us take a closer look at the Services Directive as it would be published in the Official Journal.

How to Find (and Read) EU Court Judgments

All EU cases are identified by a number/year figure. Cases before the Court of Justice are preceded by a C-, while cases decided before the General Court are preceded by a T-( for the French ‘Tribunal’).7 The Civil Service Tribunal prefixed its cases with an F-( for the French ‘Fonction publique’). Following this unique figure come the names of the parties to the case. A full case name would for example be: Case C-144/ 04, Werner Mangold v. Rüdiger Helm. However, since no one can remember all the numbers or all the parties, EU cases often get simply abbreviated by the main party; in our case Mangold.

In the past, judgments of all EU Courts were published in paper form in the purple-bound European Court Reports (ECR). Cases decided by the Court of Justice were published in the ECR-I series; cases decided by the General Court were published in the ECR-II series, while cases decided by the Civil Service Tribunal were published in the ECR-SC series. However, as of 2012, the entire Court of Justice of the European Union decided to go ‘paperless’ and it now publishes its judgments only electronically.8 The two principal websites here are the Court’s own curia website (http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/j_6), and the Union’s general EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html). For the purposes of this book, the easiest way is however to go to www.schutze.eu, which contains all the judgments mentioned in the main text – including the ‘Lisbon’ version of all classic EU Court judgments.

Once upon a time, judgments issued by the European Court were – to paraphrase Hobbes –‘nasty, brutish and short’. Their shortness was partly due to a structural division the Court made between the ‘Issues of Fact and of Law’ (or later: ‘Report for the Hearing’), which set out the facts, procedure and the arguments of the parties, on the one hand, and the ‘Grounds of Judgment’ on the other. Only the latter constituted the judgment sensu stricto and was often very short indeed. For the Court originally followed the ‘French’ ideal of trying to put the entire judgment into a single ‘sentence’! A judgment like Van Gend en Loos contains about 2,000 words – not more than an undergraduate essay.

This world of short judgments is – sadly or not – gone. A typical judgment issued today will, on average, be four to five times as long as Van Gend. (And in the worst-case scenario, a judgment, especially in the area of EU competition law, may be as long as 100,000 words – a book of about 300 pages!) This new comprehensiveness is perhaps the product of a more refined textualist methodology, but it also results from a change in the organisation and style of judgments. Modern judgments have come to integrate much of the facts and the parties’ arguments into the main body of a ‘single’ judgment, and this has especially made many direct actions much longer and much more repetitive! The structure of a modern ECJ judgment given under the preliminary reference procedure may be studied by looking at Figure 20.2.

How to Find EU Academic Resources

The literature with regard to European Union law has exploded in the last 30 years. Today, there exists a forest of European law journals and generalist textbooks. Moreover, since the mid 1990s ‘European’ law has increasingly developed specialised branches that are sometimes even taught separately at university (as is the case at my own university). The three main branches here are: European constitutional law, European internal market law and European competition law. The first was explored in Parts I and II, while the second branch (and elements of the third branch) were covered in Part III. In addition to these three ‘bigger’ branches, the last two decades have also seen the emergence of many ‘smaller’ branches, such as European external relations law, European labour law and European environmental law. And there now also exist specialised LLM courses on EU consumer law and EU tax law.

The list of journals (Table 21.5) is by no means comprehensive. It is meant to point the interested reader to a first gateway for an in-depth study of a particular part of European Union law. My selection focuses primarily on English-language academic sources. But it goes without saying that European Union law is a ‘European’ subject with journals and textbooks in every language of the Union.